Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/10450
Title: | Ductile tearing of aluminium plates: experiments and modelling | Authors: | Espeseth, Vetle Morin, David Tekoğlu, Cihan Borvik, Tore Hopperstad, Odd Sture |
Keywords: | Fracture Voids and inclusions Porous material Finite elements Stability and bifurcation Void Growth Gurson Model Strain Localization Fracture Experiments Stress Triaxiality Crack-Propagation Combined Tension Path-Dependence Damage Coalescence |
Publisher: | Springer | Abstract: | This paper presents an experimental and numerical study on quasi-static ductile tearing of thin plates of the aluminium alloy AA6016 in three tempers. Depending on the temper, the main fracture mechanism in the plate tearing tests changes from grain boundary failure to coalescence of voids nucleated at the constituent particles. The experiments are complemented by nonlinear finite element simulations using an enriched Gurson-TvergaardNeedleman (GTN) model to describe the material response. The onset of accelerated void growth is initiated either by incipient material softening (named the softening model) or by the occurrence of strain localization (named the localization model). It was found that strain localization takes place at a critical porosity f(c), which depends on the current hydrostatic and deviatoric stress states. While the failure strain depends on the stress path, the critical porosity appears to be path independent. A third method is proposed (named the f(c)( T, L) model), where a critical porosity surface f(c) = f(c) (T, L) is used to determine when accelerated void growth starts. The surface is generated beforehand by solving for strain localization under proportional stress states defined by the stress triaxiality T and the Lode parameter L. By comparing the simulations to the experiments, it was found that the localization model performed well for a wide range of stress states. The softening model does not portray dependence on the Lode parameter and is therefore less versatile. The localizationmodel and the f(c)(T, L) model gave similar predictions, but some minor differences were observed for two of the three tempers. | URI: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-023-00701-2 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/10450 |
ISSN: | 0376-9429 1573-2673 |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
5
checked on Nov 16, 2024
Page view(s)
62
checked on Nov 11, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.