Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/10789
Title: | Biomechanical performance of talon cannulated compression device in pauwels type III fractures: a comparative study | Authors: | Taşkent, H.C. Alemdaroğlu, K.B. Uslan, Y. Ercan, N. Demir, T. |
Keywords: | Biomechanical Femoral neck fractures Osteosynthesis Pauwels type III Talon-cannulated compression device Torsional stiffness |
Publisher: | Elsevier Ltd | Abstract: | Introduction: Pauwels Type III fractures are unstable and frequently treated with cannulated screws (CS) or dynamic hip screws (DHS). The newly developed talon-cannulated compression devices (TCCD) have the potential to provide rotational stability, mainly through their talon. The study investigates whether TCCD has mechanical advantages over conventional screws or can be as stable as DHS in a reverse triangle configuration for an unstable femoral neck fracture. Material and methods: After creating a standard Pauwels Type III unstable femoral neck fracture in 36 synthetic femur bones in cortical/hard cancellous bone density, 18 were reserved for dynamic-static tests, and 18 were used for torsional tests. Each group containing 18 synthetic bones was divided into three groups to apply three different fixation materials (CS, DHS, and TCCD), with six models in each group. The displacement amounts after dynamic-static tests were measured using the AutoCAD program according to the reference measurement criteria. During the dynamic tests, a series of photographs were taken. During the static tests, the beginning and post-test photographs were taken. Finally, torsional tests were performed until implant failure occurred in the synthetic femur. Results: In static axial loading tests, TCDD was found to be statistically superior to conventional CS in AL-BL distance (p = 0,014) and CL distance (p = 0,013) measurements, and there was no significant difference between the other groups. There was no significant difference between all groups in dynamic axial compression tests in any points of interest. In torsional tests, TCCD outperformed cannulated screws in stiffness (p = 0,001) and maximum torque (p = 0,001) categories, and they provided statistically significant superiority to DHS in yield torque (p<0,001) category. Conclusions: Biomechanically, TCCD predominates conventional cannulated screws in femoral neck fractures. TCCD also has superior torsional properties than DHS in the yield torque category. Therefore, TCCD could be the implant of choice for unstable femoral neck fractures. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd | URI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2023.111018 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/10789 |
ISSN: | 0020-1383 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
1
checked on Aug 31, 2024
Page view(s)
92
checked on Nov 11, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.