Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/11825
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEkmekci, P.E.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-10T15:47:49Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-10T15:47:49Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.isbn978-303156211-2-
dc.identifier.isbn978-303156210-5-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56211-2_5-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/11825-
dc.description.abstractThis section is on methodology of ethical reasoning, providing a detailed definition of the methods employed in psychiatry ethics. The prevailing approach in clinical ethics is the principle-based approach, whereby nearly every ethical problem is approached through this methodology. The principle-based approach is undeniably useful, practical, and widely accepted, particularly in the context of research ethics involving human subjects. However, relying only on the principle-based approach falls short in addressing the complexities and dilemmas arising within the realm of clinical ethics. This limited approach frequently undermines the consideration of inherent moral values of the physician-patient relationship, such as trust, fidelity, veracity, trustworthiness, confidentiality, and privacy, thus steering toward mechanical solutions that are incongruent with the art of medicine. Therefore, it is important to incorporate other ethical analysis methodologies while adressing the complex and interwoven multifaceted ethical issues and dilemmas in clinical ethics. This chapter on methodology explains normative ethical theories and contemporary approaches that have been found to be functional and successful in psychiatric ethics and have rapidly gained prominence such as the hermeneutic approach. In this chapter, these traditional and contemporary methodologies are introduced together with their philosophical frameworks, providing the reader with a comprehensive perspective on how these methods can be applied to solving ethical issues in the clinical settings. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEthical Dilemma in Psychiatry: Real Cases Scenarioen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleEthical Reasoning Methodologyen_US
dc.typeBook Parten_US
dc.departmentTOBB ETÜen_US
dc.identifier.startpage59en_US
dc.identifier.endpage80en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85204853724en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-031-56211-2_5-
dc.authorscopusid36518584100-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKitap Bölümü - Uluslararasıen_US
item.openairetypeBook Part-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

30
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.