Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/11885
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKızıltoprak, Hasan-
dc.contributor.authorİnanç tekin, Merve-
dc.contributor.authorHekimoğlu, Emine Rümeysa-
dc.contributor.authorTekin, Kemal-
dc.contributor.authorÖzüken, Kemal-
dc.contributor.authorÖzkoyuncu Kocabaş, Dilara-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-10T14:56:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-10T14:56:05Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn1300-0365-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5336/ophthal.2022-95060-
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1261365-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/11885-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the ocular surface changes fol- lowing Femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (Femto-LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Material and Methods: TThis prospective study included 74 eyes of 37 patients: 34 were in the Femto-LASIK group, and 40 were in the PRK group. Schirmer test, tear break-up time, and conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) were used to determine ocular surface changes before and 1 month, and 3 months after PRK or Femto-LASIK.Results: There were no significant differences between PRK and LASIK group in mean CIC scores in the first month (p > .05, for each). However, a significant difference ob- served at goblet cell density (GCD) at the third month between PRK and LASIK group (p =0.008). Comparing of the CIC scores between first month and the third month of PRK group showed significant im- provements in the GCD and epithelial cell sheet (p =0.005, p =0.001, respectively). However, no significant changes occurred in the Femto- LASIK group between first month and the third month (p > .05, for each). Conclusion: We observed histopathological changes in the per- ilimbal conjunctiva in the PRK and LASIK groups at the first month after surgery. It was observed that these changes continued in the 3rd postoperative month. Although GCD improved significantly in the PRK group, it was still lower than preoperatively. We can say that these changes play a primary role in the pathogenesis of dry eye and even cause a more severe course of DED in LASIK patients.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTürkiye Klinikleri Oftalmoloji Dergisien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTıbbi Araştırmalar Deneyselen_US
dc.subjectGöz Hastalıklarıen_US
dc.titleComparison of Ocular Surface Changes Following Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy: Cross-Sectional Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentTOBB ETÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage153en_US
dc.identifier.endpage161en_US
dc.institutionauthor-
dc.identifier.doi10.5336/ophthal.2022-95060-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1261365en_US
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

28
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.