Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/1468
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYaman, Onur-
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Nail-
dc.contributor.authorDağlı, Ahmet Turan-
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Erdem-
dc.contributor.authorDalbayrak, Sedat-
dc.contributor.authorTemiz, Cüneyt-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-26T08:07:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-26T08:07:00Z-
dc.date.issued2015-03-
dc.identifier.citationYaman, O., Ozdemir, N., Dagli, A. T., Acar, E., Dalbayrak, S., & Temiz, C. (2015). A comparison of bilateral decompression via unilateral approach and classic laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: A retrospective clinical study. Turkish Neurosurgery, 25(2), 239-245. doi:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.8710-13.1en_US
dc.identifier.issn1019-5149-
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/236451-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26014006-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/1468-
dc.description.abstractAIM: Bilateral decompression via unilateral approach is one of the minimally invasive methods used for degenerative spinal stenosis. The aim of this retrospective study was to observe the clinical and radiological results of classic laminectomy and bilateral decompression via unilateral approach applied for lumbar stenosis. MATERIAL and METHODS:The data of 40 patients who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with different techniques was reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical technique. In the first group, patients underwent classic laminectomy, while in the second group patients underwent bilateral decompression via unilateral approach. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography section areas of both groups were examined.Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate low back and leg pain in preoperative and postoperative 1, 6, and 12 months. The two groups were compared in respect of surgery time and bleeding. RESULTS: In both groups, postoperative low back and leg pain VAS scores declined compared to the preoperative condition. Low back pain VAS scores were lower at postoperartive 1, 6, and 12 months. The bleeding was higher in the 1st group, whereas the surgery time was higher in the 2nd group. CONCLUSION: Bilateral decompression through unilateral approach is an effective method without instability effect, which provides sufficient decompression in the degenerative stenosis and increases patient comfort in the postoperative period.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Neurosurgical Socen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Neurosurgeryen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLumbar stenosisen_US
dc.subjectUnilateral approachen_US
dc.subjectMinimally invasiveen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of Bilateral Decompression Via Unilateral Approach and Classic Laminectomy in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Clinical Studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeLomber Dar Kanalı Olan Hastalarda Tek Taraflı Girişimle İki Taraflı Dekompresyonun Klasik Laminektomi ile Karşılaştırılması: Bir Retrospektif Klinik Çalışmaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume25-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.startpage239-
dc.identifier.endpage245-
dc.authorid0000-0002-3661-5563-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000352928500007en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84928711148en_US
dc.institutionauthorAcar, Erdem-
dc.identifier.pmid26014006en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.8710-13.1-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3-
dc.identifier.trdizinid236451en_US
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept02.7. Department of Mechanical Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Mechanical Engineering
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Dec 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
checked on Dec 21, 2024

Page view(s)

154
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.