Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/1524
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaçıra, Burkay Kutluhan-
dc.contributor.authorÖzkaya, Mustafa-
dc.contributor.authorKıran, Uygar-
dc.contributor.authorTürkmen, Faik-
dc.contributor.authorArazi, Mehmet-
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Teyfik-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-26T08:07:04Z
dc.date.available2019-06-26T08:07:04Z
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.identifier.citationKacira, B. K., Özkaya, M., Kiran, U., Türkmen, F., Arazi, M., & Demir, T. (2016). Biomechanical fixation strength comparison of ilioingunial and medial stoppa approaches on anterior column fractures. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 16(06), 1650081.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0219-5194
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519416500810-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/1524-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Both the ilioinguinal and Stoppa approaches have been used as standard methods for treating anterior column fractures of the pelvis. Objective: We aimed to compare the rigidity of pelvises that were treated using these two approaches. Methods: Fifteen synthetic pelvises were used as test models. Of these, 5 pelvises did not undergo any treatment (control group), and 10 pelvises underwent treatment of one column using the ilioinguinal approach and the other using the medial Stoppa approach (treated group). The compression test was performed on all pelvises, and rigidity of the pelvises was compared between the control and treated groups. Results: A statistical difference was found in the angle between the center of the femoral head and the line from the pubic symphysis to load application between the control and treated groups, using the ilioinguinal approach. The parametric displacement was greater in the treated group using the ilioinguinal approach than in the control group. There were no significant differences between the control and treated groups using the Stoppa approach, and the ilioinguinal approaches. Conclusion: Clinically, the Stoppa approach has several advantages over the ilioinguinal approach. However, based on the compression test, there was no difference in biomechanical rigidity between the fixations performed using these two approaches.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWorld Scientific Publ Co Pte Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Mechanics In Medicine And Biologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnterior column fracturesen_US
dc.subjectmedial stoppa approachen_US
dc.subjectilioinguinal approachen_US
dc.subjectpelvisen_US
dc.titleBiomechanical Fixation Strength Comparison Of Ilioingunial And Medial Stoppa Approaches On Anterior Column Fracturesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.authorid0000-0001-6352-8302-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000382846900005en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84973664419en_US
dc.institutionauthorDemir, Teyfik-
dc.identifier.doi10.1142/S0219519416500810-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Mechanical Engineering
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Dec 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Aug 31, 2024

Page view(s)

132
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.