Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/1528
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Karakoyun, Dursun O. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Özkaya, Mustafa | - |
dc.contributor.author | Okutan, Volkan C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dalgıç, Ali | - |
dc.contributor.author | Belen, Deniz | - |
dc.contributor.author | Demir, Teyfik | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-26T08:07:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-06-26T08:07:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Karakoyun, D. O., Özkaya, M., Okutan, V. C., Dalgıç, A., Belen, D., & Demir, T. (2015). Biomechanical comparison of unilateral semi-rigid and dynamic stabilization on ovine vertebrae. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 229(11), 778-785. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0954-4119 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411915612493 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/1528 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Using the unilateral pedicle screw fixation was thought to decrease the stiffness of the fixed segments. Various prospective, randomized studies were performed to determine whether unilateral pedicle screw fixation provides the necessities of bilateral fixation in one- or two-segment lumbar spinal fusion. In this study, four different unilateral pedicle screw fixation systems were evaluated to determine which one best approximated an intact spine with respect to biomechanics and kinematics. The four groups included an intact group, a unilateral facetectomy group with no fixation, a unilateral semi-rigid pedicle screw fixation group with a poly-ether-ether-ketone rod, and a unilateral dynamic pedicle screw fixation group. The bone mineral densities of all specimens were measured and specimens were matched with groups randomly. Flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation tests were performed to compare the groups. For the flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation tests, the best biomechanical outcomes were in the control group. The unilateral facetectomy group had the poorest performance and was not stable enough, compared with the control group. The dynamic and semi-rigid groups showed performance closer to that of the control group. The biomechanical responses of these two groups were also in good agreement, showing no significant statistical differences. Based on these test results, it is concluded that the unilateral dynamic and semi-rigid pedicle screw fixations can be used to provide stability to the vertebrae. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | The authors would like to acknowledge Turkish Science Foundation (TUBITAK) with the project #111M583 and #113S101 for the financial support for the study. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications Ltd | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Proceedings Of The Institution Of Mechanical Engineers Part H-Journal Of Engineering In Medicine | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Biomechanical testing | en_US |
dc.subject | analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | biomedical devices | en_US |
dc.subject | orthopedic materials | en_US |
dc.subject | spine biomechanics | en_US |
dc.subject | spinal implants | en_US |
dc.title | Biomechanical Comparison of Unilateral Semi-Rigid and Dynamic Stabilization on Ovine Vertebrae | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.department | Faculties, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering | en_US |
dc.department | Fakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.volume | 229 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 11 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 778 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 785 | |
dc.relation.tubitak | Turkish Science Foundation (TUBITAK) [111M583, 113S101] | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0001-6352-8302 | - |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000363967200003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84945245015 | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Demir, Teyfik | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 26503839 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0954411915612493 | - |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
Appears in Collections: | Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Mechanical Engineering PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
6
checked on Dec 21, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
5
checked on Aug 31, 2024
Page view(s)
94
checked on Dec 23, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.