Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/1961
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Aydoğdu, Mehmet Fatih | - |
dc.contributor.author | Çelik, Vakkas | - |
dc.contributor.author | Demirci, Muhammed Fatih | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-10T14:42:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-10T14:42:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Aydogdu, M. F., Celik, V., & Demirci, M. F. (2017, January). Comparison of three different cnn architectures for age classification. In 2017 IEEE 11th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) (pp. 372-377). IEEE. | en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-1-5090-4284-5 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2325-6516 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7889565/ | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/1961 | - |
dc.description | 11th IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (2017 : San Diego, CA) | |
dc.description.abstract | As one of the powerful tools of machine learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architectures are used to solve complex problems like image recognition, video analysis and natural language processing. In this paper, three different CNN architectures for age classification using face images are compared. The Morph dataset containing over 55k images is used in experiments and success of a 6-layer CNN and 2 variants of ResNet with different depths are compared. The images in the dataset are divided into 6 different age classes. While 80% of the images are used in training of the networks, the rest of the 20% is used for testing. The performance of the networks are compared according to two different criteria namely, the ability to make the estimation pointing the exact age classes of test images and the ability to make the estimation pointing the exact age classes or at most neighboring classes of the images. According to the performance results obtained, with 6-layer network, it is possible to estimate the exact or neighboring classes of the images with less than 5% error. It is shown that for a 6 class age classification problem 6-layer network is more successful than the deeper ResNet counterparts since 6-layer network is less susceptible to overfitting for this problem. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | IEEE | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Face recognition | en_US |
dc.subject | Estimation | en_US |
dc.subject | Age classification | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of Three Different Cnn Architectures for Age Classification | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Object | en_US |
dc.department | Faculties, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Computer Engineering | en_US |
dc.department | Fakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümü | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.startpage | 372 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 377 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000403391300070 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85018339128 | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Demirci, Muhammed Fatih | - |
dc.institutionauthor | Aydoğdu, Mehmet Fatih | - |
dc.institutionauthor | Çelik, Vakkas | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/ICSC.2017.61 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | 14041575400 | - |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Konferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | - | - |
item.openairetype | Conference Object | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 02.3. Department of Computer Engineering | - |
Appears in Collections: | Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Computer Engineering Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
9
checked on Dec 21, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
15
checked on Nov 9, 2024
Page view(s)
90
checked on Dec 23, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.