Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3821
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Uludağ, Abuzer | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tosun, Hacı Bayram | - |
dc.contributor.author | Çelik, Suat | - |
dc.contributor.author | Serbest, Sancar | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kayalar, Murat | - |
dc.contributor.author | Aytaç, Güneş | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sindel, Muzaffer | - |
dc.contributor.author | Erbay Elibol, Fatma Kübra | - |
dc.contributor.author | Demir, Teyfik | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-21T10:05:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-21T10:05:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Uludağ, A., Tosun, H. B., Çelik, S., Serbest, S., Kayalar, M., Aytaç, G., and Demir, T. (2020). Comparison of various tendon repair techniques in extansor zone 3 injuries: an experimental biomechanical cadaver study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 1-8. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1434-3916 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0936-8051 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-020-03384-9 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3821 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose To compare five different repair techniques for extensor tendon zone III modified Kessler (MK), double-modified Kessler (DMK), modified Kessler epitendinous (MKE), double-modified Kessler epitendinous (DMKE), and running-interlocking horizontal mattress (RIHM) in terms of shortening, stiffness, gap formation, and ultimate load to failure. Methods A total of 35 human cadaver fingers were randomly assigned to five suture techniques with 7 fingers each and were tested under dynamic and static loading conditions. Results DMK was found to be superior over MK in terms of ultimate load to failure (36 N vs. 24 N, respectively), shortening (1.75 vs. 2.20 mm, respectively) and gap formation. However, these two methods had similar characteristics in terms of stiffness. The addition of epitendinous sutures to the repair methods resulted in approximately 40% increase in ultimate load to failure, whereas epitendinous sutures had no effect on shortening. DMKE was found to be superior over MKE in terms of shortening (1.77 vs. 2.22 mm, respectively). However, these two methods had similar characteristics in terms of mean ultimate load to failure and stiffness. RIHM was found to be superior over the other four methods in terms of ultimate load to failure (89 N), stiffness, and shortening (0.75 mm). Conclusion RIHM was found to be stronger and more durable for extensor tendon zone III than the other techniques in terms of ultimate load to failure and stiffness. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Hand injury | en_US |
dc.subject | Extansor | en_US |
dc.subject | Tendon repair | en_US |
dc.subject | Zone 3 | en_US |
dc.subject | Suture | en_US |
dc.subject | Biomechanic | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of Various Tendon Repair Techniques in Extansor Zone 3 Injuries: an Experimental Biomechanical Cadaver Study | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.department | Faculties, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering | en_US |
dc.department | Fakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.volume | 140 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 583 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 590 | |
dc.authorid | 0000-0001-6352-8302 | - |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000522643800019 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85081036218 | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Demir, Teyfik | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 32130480 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00402-020-03384-9 | - |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 03.14. Department of Internal Medicine | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 02.2. Department of Biomedical Engineering | - |
Appears in Collections: | Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Mechanical Engineering PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
1
checked on Dec 21, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
3
checked on Dec 21, 2024
Page view(s)
144
checked on Dec 23, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.