Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/6307
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKlepper, Kjetil-
dc.contributor.authorSandve, Geir K.-
dc.contributor.authorAbul, Osman-
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Jostein-
dc.contributor.authorDrablos, Finn-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-11T15:35:44Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-11T15:35:44Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2105-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-123-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/6307-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Computational discovery of regulatory elements is an important area of bioinformatics research and more than a hundred motif discovery methods have been published. Traditionally, most of these methods have addressed the problem of single motif discovery discovering binding motifs for individual transcription factors. In higher organisms, however, transcription factors usually act in combination with nearby bound factors to induce specific regulatory behaviours. Hence, recent focus has shifted from single motifs to the discovery of sets of motifs bound by multiple cooperating transcription factors, so called composite motifs or cis-regulatory modules. Given the large number and diversity of methods available, independent assessment of methods becomes important. Although there have been several benchmark studies of single motif discovery, no similar studies have previously been conducted concerning composite motif discovery. Results: We have developed a benchmarking framework for composite motif discovery and used it to evaluate the performance of eight published module discovery tools. Benchmark datasets were constructed based on real genomic sequences containing experimentally verified regulatory modules, and the module discovery programs were asked to predict both the locations of these modules and to specify the single motifs involved. To aid the programs in their search, we provided position weight matrices corresponding to the binding motifs of the transcription factors involved. In addition, selections of decoy matrices were mixed with the genuine matrices on one dataset to test the response of programs to varying levels of noise. Conclusion: Although some of the methods tested tended to score somewhat better than others overall, there were still large variations between individual datasets and no single method performed consistently better than the rest in all situations. The variation in performance on individual datasets also shows that the new benchmark datasets represents a suitable variety of challenges to most methods for module discovery.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBmcen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBmc Bioinformaticsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject[No Keywords]en_US
dc.titleAssessment of Composite Motif Discovery Methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Computer Engineeringen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-5794-828X-
dc.authorid0000-0002-4959-1409-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000255282500001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-42249100180en_US
dc.institutionauthorAbul, Osman-
dc.identifier.pmid18302777en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2105-9-123-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept02.3. Department of Computer Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Computer Engineering
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

40
checked on Dec 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

35
checked on Aug 31, 2024

Page view(s)

110
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.