Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/6366
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArestis, Philip-
dc.contributor.authorCaner, Asena-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-11T15:36:04Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-11T15:36:04Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.issn0309-166X-
dc.identifier.issn1464-3545-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep062-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/6366-
dc.description.abstractThe literature on the theoretical and empirical aspects of the relationship between finance and economic growth is both substantial and extensive. The same cannot be said on the relationship between financial development and poverty reduction-an equally important aspect. In this study, we visit the theoretical arguments and conduct an empirical analysis of the relationship between the capital account dimension of financial liberalisation and poverty for developing countries for the period 1985-2005. In particular, we employ the 'system GMM' technique to test whether capital account liberalisation has helped alleviate poverty, and also whether the extent to which capital account liberalisation affects poverty depends on the quality of institutions. We also use OLS and IV techniques to verify our findings. Our findings indicate that there is no statistically significant relationship between the degree of capital account liberalisation during the period and the poverty rate. Developing countries with higher institutional quality have lower poverty rates, but the effect has low statistical significance. A higher degree of capital account liberalisation is associated with a lower income share for the poor.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford Univ Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCambridge Journal of Economicsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCapital account liberalisationen_US
dc.subjectPovertyen_US
dc.subjectQuality of institutionsen_US
dc.subjectDeveloping countriesen_US
dc.subjectO16en_US
dc.subjectI32en_US
dc.titleCapital Account Liberalisation and Poverty: How Close Is the Link?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economicsen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İktisat Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage295en_US
dc.identifier.endpage323en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000274974500005en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77950919679en_US
dc.institutionauthorCaner, Nur Asena-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/cje/bep062-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept04.01. Department of Economics-
Appears in Collections:İktisat Bölümü / Department of Economics
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

30
checked on Dec 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

30
checked on Aug 31, 2024

Page view(s)

204
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.