Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/6845
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorİsen Durmuş, Tuba Işınsu-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-11T15:43:51Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-11T15:43:51Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-3984-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/6845-
dc.description.abstractSince Tanzimat period, one of the debates of Turkish literature has been, not to determine standart and definable criteria for the term of classic. Today, if you ask anybody the question "which classics do you read?", the answer will not be from the Turkish classics. The first reason for this is, turkish classics are not considered in the context of world classics. In accordance with the canon debates, the questions of "what is a classic" and "who identify these books", are come up again in recent years. In this article, ideas about the questions "can we identify classics" and "do Turkish literature have classics" will be interpreted by the help of survey and inquiries done in years since the eighties by different institutions. The perception of classics in western literatures and interpretations about "who identify classics" also take part in the article. This is not for comparing Turkish and western literatures one to one, it is just for indicating similarities with the perception in Turkish literature. The debates of classics, started by Ahmet Mithat, were exacerbated by the intellectuals of that period around the questions of "do we have classics" and "what should we call classics". In this context, because the period before the foundation of republic is not accepted as a classic period, it causes a "confuse" around the question of "what are the classics of Turkish literature". In this article, it is emphasized that this "confuse" can also be seen the publishers' perception of classics. It is also emphasized in the article that even if different groups accepted some books "important and great" without any debate, it is impossible to talk about a standart "classics" list for everyone unless the debates of canon/canons in Turkish literature settle down.en_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherMilli Folklor Dergisien_US
dc.relation.ispartofMilli Folkloren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectClassicen_US
dc.subjectturkish literatureen_US
dc.subjectcanonen_US
dc.subjectclassic booken_US
dc.subjectclassic authoren_US
dc.titleIdeas on the Perception of Classics in Turkish Literatureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Science and Literature, Department of Turkish Language and Literatureen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.issue90en_US
dc.identifier.startpage37en_US
dc.identifier.endpage48en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000292407200005en_US
dc.institutionauthorİsen Durmuş, Tuba Işınsu-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1tr-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept07.05. Department of Turkish Literature-
Appears in Collections:Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Bölümü / Department of Turkish Language & Literature
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Oct 5, 2024

Page view(s)

176
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check





Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.