Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/8375
Title: | MoRS: An Approximate Fault Modelling Framework for Reduced-Voltage SRAMs | Authors: | Yüksel, I.E. Salami, B. Ergin, Oğuz Ünsal, O.S. Kestelman, A.C. |
Keywords: | Circuit faults Data models Fault-injection Integrated circuit modeling Mathematical models Modeling Neural Networks Power demand Random access memory SRAM. Undervolting Voltage Deep neural networks Energy efficiency Integrated circuits Memory architecture Program processors Software testing Static random access storage Circuit faults Fault injection Fault model Integrated circuit modeling Modeling Neural-networks Power demands Random access memory SRAM. Undervolting Timing circuits |
Publisher: | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. | Abstract: | On-chip memory (usually based on Static RAMs-SRAMs) are crucial components for various computing devices including heterogeneous devices, e.g, GPUs, FPGAs, ASICs to achieve high performance. Modern workloads such as Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) running on these heterogeneous fabrics are highly dependent on the on-chip memory architecture for efficient acceleration. Hence, improving the energy-efficiency of such memories directly leads to an efficient system. One of the common methods to save energy is undervolting i.e., supply voltage underscaling below the nominal level. Such systems can be safely undervolted without incurring faults down to a certain voltage limit. This safe range is also called voltage guardband. However, reducing voltage below the guardband level without decreasing frequency causes timing-based faults. In this paper, we propose MoRS, a framework that generates the first approximate undervolting fault model using real faults extracted from experimental undervolting studies on SRAMs to build the model. We inject the faults generated by MoRS into the on-chip memory of the DNN accelerator to evaluate the resilience of the system under the test. MoRS has the advantage of simplicity without any need for high-time overhead experiments while being accurate enough in comparison to a fully randomly-generated fault injection approach. We evaluate our experiment in popular DNN workloads by mapping weights to SRAMs and measure the accuracy difference between the output of the MoRS and the real data. Our results show that the maximum difference between real fault data and the output fault model of MoRS is 6.21%, whereas the maximum difference between real data and random fault injection model is 23.2%. In terms of average proximity to the real data, the output of MoRS outperforms the random fault injection approach by 3.21x. IEEE | URI: | https://doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2021.3120073 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/8375 |
ISSN: | 0278-0070 |
Appears in Collections: | Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Computer Engineering Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.