Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/837
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPramuanjaroenkij, Anchasa-
dc.contributor.authorTongkratoke, Amarin-
dc.contributor.authorKakaç, Sadık-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-25T07:07:21Z
dc.date.available2019-03-25T07:07:21Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-22
dc.identifier.citationPramuanjaroenkij, A., Tongkratoke, A., & Kakaç, S. (2018). Numerical study of mixing thermal conductivity models for nanofluid heat transfer enhancement. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics, 91(1), 104-114.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10891-018-1724-0.pdf-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/837-
dc.description.abstractResearchers have paid attention to nanofluid applications, since nanofluids have revealed their potentials as working fluids in many thermal systems. Numerical studies of convective heat transfer in nanofluids can be based on considering them as single- and two-phase fluids. This work is focused on improving the single-phase nanofluid model performance, since the employment of this model requires less calculation time and it is less complicated due to utilizing the mixing thermal conductivity model, which combines static and dynamic parts used in the simulation domain alternately. The in-house numerical program has been developed to analyze the effects of the grid nodes, effective viscosity model, boundary-layer thickness, and of the mixing thermal conductivity model on the nanofluid heat transfer enhancement. CuO–water, Al2O3–water, and Cu–water nanofluids are chosen, and their laminar fully developed flows through a rectangular channel are considered. The influence of the effective viscosity model on the nanofluid heat transfer enhancement is estimated through the average differences between the numerical and experimental results for the nanofluids mentioned. The nanofluid heat transfer enhancement results show that the mixing thermal conductivity model consisting of the Maxwell model as the static part and the Yu and Choi model as the dynamic part, being applied to all three nanofluids, brings the numerical results closer to the experimental ones. The average differences between those results for CuO–water, Al2O3–water, and CuO–water nanofluid flows are 3.25, 2.74, and 3.02%, respectively. The mixing thermal conductivity model has been proved to increase the accuracy of the single-phase nanofluid simulation and to reveal its potentials in the single-phase nanofluid numerical studies. © 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer New York LLCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysicsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBoundary layeren_US
dc.subjectSingle phaseen_US
dc.subjectMixing thermal conductivity modelen_US
dc.subjectNanofluiden_US
dc.titleNumerical Study of Mixing Thermal Conductivity Models for Nanofluid Heat Transfer Enhancementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume91
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage104
dc.identifier.endpage114
dc.authorid0000-0002-7839-8034-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000429364000011en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85042372755en_US
dc.institutionauthorKakaç, Sadık-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10891-018-1724-0-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept02.7. Department of Mechanical Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Mechanical Engineering
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Dec 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

30
checked on Dec 21, 2024

Page view(s)

116
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.