Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/854
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÖzbayoğlu, Mehmet Evren-
dc.contributor.authorErge, Öney-
dc.contributor.authorÖzbayoğlu, Ahmet Murat-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-26T13:16:54Z
dc.date.available2019-03-26T13:16:54Z
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.identifier.citationOzbayoglu, E. M., Erge, O., & Ozbayoglu, M. A. (2018). Predicting the pressure losses while the drillstring is buckled and rotating using artificial intelligence methods. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 56, 72-80.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/854-
dc.description.abstractThe prediction of equivalent circulating density in realistic conditions is complex due to many parameters in effect. Drillstring configuration and motion can play a significant role on the pressure profile in the annulus. Eccentricity, rotation and axial position of the drillstring can cause distinct pressure losses. If an accurate prediction is desired, these effects need to be accounted for. In this study, the pressure losses of Yield Power Law fluids with various drillstring rotation speeds and configurations are analyzed. These configurations include eccentricity and various buckling configurations and rotation speeds of the drillstring. Neural networks are used to predict the pressure losses and the results are compared with the experimental results and existing models from the literature. The input to the neural networks is optimized by comparing using direct measurements and using dimensionless parameters derived from the measurements. The comparison shows that using direct measurements as input yield better results instead of using dimensionless parameters, considering the experimental data used in this study. The results of this study showed that using neural networks to predict the pressure losses in complex geometries and motion showed a better precision compared to the existing models from the literature. The results analysis show that predicting with neural networks can yield as low as 5% absolute average percent error while predicting using existing models can yield as high as 115% absolute average percent error. Using neural networks shows a strong potential to accurately predict the pressure losses especially considering complex fluids and geometries.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Natural Gas Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEquivalent circulating densityen_US
dc.subjectFlow in annulien_US
dc.subjectPressure lossesen_US
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence methodsen_US
dc.subjectNeural networksen_US
dc.titlePredicting the Pressure Losses While the Drillstring Is Buckled and Rotating Using Artificial Intelligence Methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Computer Engineeringen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume56en_US
dc.identifier.startpage72en_US
dc.identifier.endpage80en_US
dc.relation.echttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2018.05.028
dc.authorid0000-0001-7998-5735-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000438702800007en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85047839601en_US
dc.institutionauthorÖzbayoğlu, Ahmet Murat-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jngse.2018.05.028-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.dept02.1. Department of Artificial Intelligence Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Computer Engineering
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Dec 21, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
checked on Dec 21, 2024

Page view(s)

212
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.