Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/8666
Title: | Ductile failure predictions using micromechanically-based computational models | Authors: | Dæhli L.E.B. Tekoğlu, Cihan Morin D. Børvik T. Hopperstad O.S. |
Keywords: | Ductile fracture Finite element analysis Micromechanical modelling Strain localization Unit cell model Void coalescence Computation theory Computational methods Ductile fracture Porous materials Computational modelling Ductile failures Ductile solids Failure criteria Failures prediction Finite element analyse Micromechanical modelling Strain localizations Unit-cell model Void coalescence Finite element method |
Publisher: | Elsevier Ltd | Source: | Dæhli, L. E. B., Tekoğlu, C., Morin, D., Børvik, T., & Hopperstad, O. S. (2022). Ductile failure predictions using micromechanically-based computational models. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 164, 104873. | Abstract: | Three different micromechanically-based computational models for fracture in porous ductile solids are compared and assessed. Model A is a unit cell model of a porous ductile solid comprising a uniform periodic distribution of voids subjected to normal macroscopic loading. Models B and C, on the other hand, are unit-cell type models that represent an imperfection band governed by a doubly periodic array of voids separating two non-porous outer blocks. The outer blocks have a finite size in Model B and are semi-infinite in Model C. The non-porous material surrounding the voids, and the material of the outer blocks in Model B and Model C, are considered as an elasto-plastic isotropic material. Numerical simulations are performed for a wide range of macroscopic stress states. For each model, various criteria for determining the onset of ductile failure are evaluated to demonstrate their impact on the failure predictions. The results show that the failure loci strongly depend on the computational model and failure criterion employed. Thus, these three models cannot be used interchangeably – neither to investigate failure mechanisms nor to develop or calibrate fracture models – and an unambiguous failure criterion must be chosen. © 2022 The Author(s) | URI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2022.104873 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/8666 |
ISSN: | 0022-5096 |
Appears in Collections: | Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Mechanical Engineering Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
Show full item record
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
2
checked on Nov 9, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
14
checked on Nov 9, 2024
Page view(s)
130
checked on Nov 11, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.