Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/8857
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bayrak, Cansin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kutlu, Mucahid | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-30T19:22:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-30T19:22:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2329-924X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2022.3178052 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/8857 | - |
dc.description | Article; Early Access | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Social media platforms provide massive amounts of data that can be used to analyze social issues and forecast events in the future. However, it is a challenging task due to the biased and noisy nature of the data. In this work, we propose a method to predict election results via Twitter. In particular, we first detect the stance of social media accounts using their retweets. Subsequently, we develop four different counting methods for our prediction task. In the simple user counting (SC) method, we count labeled users without taking any further steps to reduce bias. In the city-based weighted counting (CBWC) method, we apply a weighted counting based on the number of electorate in each city. The closest-city-based prediction (CCBP) method utilizes sociological similarity between cities to predict results for cities with limited sample sizes. The using former election results (UFERs) method compares predictions for each city against former election results to detect data bias and uses them accordingly. We evaluate our proposed methods with the data collected for the presidential election of Turkey held in 2018. In our extensive evaluation, we show that utilizing domain-specific information and location-based weighted counting is effective in reducing bias. CBWC, CCBP, and UFER methods outperform tweet-counting-based baseline methods. Furthermore, UFER and CCBP outperform almost all traditional polls, suggesting that social media platforms are alternative mediums for conducting election polls. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [ARDEB 3501, 120E514] | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) ARDEB 3501 under Grant 120E514. The numerical calculations reported in this paper were partially performed at TUBITAK ULAKBIM, High Performance and Grid Computing Center (TRUBA resources). | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | IEEE-Inst Electrical Electronics Engineers Inc | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ieee Transactions On Computational Social Systems | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Election prediction | en_US |
dc.subject | public opinion | en_US |
dc.subject | social media | en_US |
dc.subject | stance detection | en_US |
dc.subject | en_US | |
dc.title | Predicting Election Results Via Social Media: a Case Study for 2018 Turkish Presidential Election | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.authorid | Kutlu, Mucahid/0000-0002-5660-4992 | - |
dc.authorid | BAYRAK, CANSIN/0000-0003-0741-9501 | - |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000809362300001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85131770228 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/TCSS.2022.3178052 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | 57202773428 | - |
dc.authorscopusid | 35299304300 | - |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | - |
dc.ozel | 2022v3_Edit | en_US |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
crisitem.author.dept | 02.3. Department of Computer Engineering | - |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection |
CORE Recommender
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
4
checked on Sep 21, 2024
Page view(s)
134
checked on Dec 23, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.