Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/1394
Title: Rokuronyum enjeksiyon ağrısının önlenmesinde bölgesel ısıtma ve lidokain enjeksiyon tekniklerinin karşılaştırılması
Other Titles: The comparison of local warming and lidocaine injection techniques for the prevention of rocuronium injection pain
Authors: Can, Ali
Altınsoy, Savafl
Ütebey, Gülten
Özlü, Onur
12754
Keywords: Propofol
Pain
Rocuronium injection
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Uzmanlaı Derneği
Source: Can, A., Altinsoy, S., Ütebey, G., & Özlü, O. (2017). The comparison of local warming and lidocaine injection techniques for the prevention of rocuronium injection pain. [Rokuronyum enjeksiyon a?risinin önlenmesinde bölgesel isitma ve lidokain enjeksiyon tekniklerinin karşilaştirilmasi] Anestezi Dergisi, 25(4), 197-200.
Abstract: Objective: Rocuronium-linked injection pain often occurs. In this study, we aimed to compare the local heating of the injection site and the iv lidocaine administration in the prevention of injection pain with rocuronium. Method: In the ASA I-II risk group, scheduled for operation in the context of general anesthesia with ethics committee approval and written approval, 60 patients aged 18-65 years were included in the study in 3 randomly assigned groups. Tourniquets were applied to the front arm in all three groups. In group 1 (n = 20) 2 ml of saline was administered iv; thirty seconds later the turnstile opened; 1 ml (10 mg) of rocuronium was applied for 2 seconds. In group 2 (n = 20) the patient's arm was warmed externally with the patient's heating blanket adjusted to 43 °C; turnstile opened at 30th; external heating was applied for a total of 1 minute; followed by 1 ml (10 mg) of rocuronium for 2 seconds. In Group 3 (n = 20), 1ml (10 mg) rocuronium was administered for 2 seconds following 2 ml of 2% lidocaine iv. Following rocuronium injection in the intubation dose, the pain was assessed by a 4-point traction response score. Results: The groups were similar in terms of demographics. The 4 point verbal rating scales were significantly different in Group 1, compared to Group 2 and Group 3 (2,0+0,8 and 0,5+0,5 and 0,3+0,4, mean+SD). There was no statistically significant difference between Groups 2 and 3. The 4 point withdrawal response scores and the number of patients who had withdrawal response were found to be significantly higher in Group 2, and no statistical difference between Groups 1 and 3. Conclusion: Local heating or lidocaine applications may be used to prevent injection pain during priming of rocuronium. We believe that both administration of lidocaine can be preferred to local heating in the prevention of rocuronium-induced mild withdrawal response at the intubation dose, and that both treatments prevent severe response.
URI: https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/278400
http://www.anestezidergisi.com/cilt/25/sayi/4
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/1394
ISSN: 1300-0578
Appears in Collections:Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü / Department of Surgical Sciences
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar / TR Dizin Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

6
checked on Dec 26, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.