Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/6534
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDoğan, Recep-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-11T15:37:12Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-11T15:37:12Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.issn1462-4745-
dc.identifier.issn1741-3095-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1462474513504797-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/6534-
dc.description.abstractThe Coroners and Justice Act 2009 substantially reshaped the law on provocation in England and Wales. The Act was prompted by the Government and guided by the Law Commission. It is unfortunate that the Commission and Government dismissed the issue of honour killings so quickly, on the basis of unconvincing research evidence. Honour killing cases were ruled out as potential provocation cases and left outside the scope of the defence of loss of control, by assuming that in honour killing cases the defendant must have acted in a considered desire for revenge. However, the Act is flawed by the assumption that all honour killing cases are revenge killings. In the light of the author's research, this article will argue that there are honour killing cases the circumstances of which deserve to be left to the jury, as the desire for revenge is not the motive at all and the defendant was able to resist the pressure until the final triggering act.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofPunishment & Society-International Journal of Penologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectadmissible evidenceen_US
dc.subjectCoroners and Justice Act 2009en_US
dc.subjecthonour killingsen_US
dc.subjectloss of control defenceen_US
dc.subjectrevenge killingsen_US
dc.titleDid the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 get it right? Are all honour killings revenge killings?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Lawen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Hukuk Fakültesitr_TR
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage488en_US
dc.identifier.endpage514en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000328499300003en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84890500648en_US
dc.institutionauthorDoğan, Recep-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1462474513504797-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Hukuk Fakültesi / Faculty of Law
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Sep 23, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
checked on Sep 24, 2022

Page view(s)

8
checked on Sep 26, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.