Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/7610
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWasti, S. Arzu-
dc.contributor.authorErdaş, K. Duygu-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-11T15:58:14Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-11T15:58:14Z-
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-0221-
dc.identifier.issn1552-5422-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118806580-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/7610-
dc.description.abstractMost research on workplace incivility has been conducted in the United States, where the cultural logic of dignity prescribes that individuals' worthiness be determined in reference to self-set standards. This inductive study explores the construal of workplace incivility in a contrasting cultural logic of honor, where an individual's worth is largely dependent on the esteem of others. In particular, it seeks to understand how the logic of honor may influence which behaviors are labeled as incivility and which criteria are used to appraise uncivil behaviors in the Turkish context. In the first phase of the study, we asked 53 Turkish employees for examples of workplace incivility behaviors and generated 32 incivility episodes. In the second and third phases, using data from 35 business students and 106 Turkish employees, we analyzed these episodes using multidimensional scaling technique. The results suggested that workplace incivility may have both universal and culturally salient manifestations, and that Turkish respondents appraised uncivil behaviors along three dimensions: honor threatening versus ordinary, excluding versus intruding, inoffensive versus offensive. We further observed that Turkish participants differentiated the power of the instigator (supervisor vs. coworker) as well as the omission of versus commission of behaviors. We discuss the results with a focus on understanding how the honor logic may manifest itself in professional relationships.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey)Turkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (TUBITAK)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: K. Duygu Erdas completed this research during her doctoral studies which were supported by a PhD scholarship from TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectworkplace incivilityen_US
dc.subjectculture of honoren_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.titleThe Construal of Workplace Incivility in Honor Cultures: Evidence From Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Managementen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İşletme Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume50en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage130en_US
dc.identifier.endpage148en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-7809-5925-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000454139000010en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85058935715en_US
dc.institutionauthorErdaş, K. Duygu-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0022022118806580-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:İşletme Bölümü / Department of Management
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Mar 23, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Mar 9, 2024

Page view(s)

58
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.