Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/809
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUz, İrem-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-22T06:02:53Z
dc.date.available2019-03-22T06:02:53Z
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.identifier.citationUz, I. (2018). Cross‐validation of cultural tightness and looseness measures. International Journal of Psychology, 53(4), 287-294.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijop.12376-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/809-
dc.description.abstractThe goal of the present study was to cross-validate two measures of cultural tightness and looseness, CTL: one used in a comparison within the United States, and the other used in a cross-country comparison. The former was based mainly on aggregation of state laws on controversial issues and religiosity and the latter on assessment of homogeneity in moral values among representative samples across countries. To cross-validate these two measures, both were recomputed at the US divisional level. Despite the differences in their methods of computation, the two measures of CTL correlated highly with each other, r=.92, and with theoretical variables of interest. Further, when the two measures of CTL were used simultaneously to predict theoretical variables of interest, neither remained significant suggesting that they were substitutable with each other. Convergence of results with measures computed via maximally different methods increases the confidence in the validity of these two CTL measures.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Psychologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCultural tightness and loosenessen_US
dc.subjectMeasurementen_US
dc.subjectCross-validationen_US
dc.subjectReligionen_US
dc.titleCross-validation of cultural tightness and looseness measuresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Science and Literature, Department of Psychologyen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage287en_US
dc.identifier.endpage294en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000437684600006en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84980376552en_US
dc.institutionauthorUz, İrem-
dc.contributor.YOKid21526-
dc.identifier.pmid27485831en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ijop.12376-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.dept07.04. Department of Psychology-
Appears in Collections:Psikoloji Bölümü / Department of Psychology
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Sep 23, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
checked on Sep 24, 2022

Page view(s)

70
checked on Dec 26, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.