Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/8268
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorİmani, E.-
dc.contributor.authorİmani, S.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-15T13:00:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-15T13:00:48Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn2555-0403-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123104001-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/8268-
dc.description2020 2nd International Conference on Power, Energy and Electrical Engineering, PEEE 2020 -- 4 December 2020 through 6 December 2020 -- 166766en_US
dc.description.abstractFrom the 1950s onward, Brutalist style spread all over the world and dedicate many breathtaking architectural movements to buildings. Architect's opinion about this prominent approach to building design varies greatly. Brutalist style has known primarily for its aesthetics and property for institutional buildings with the use of functional reinforced concrete, steel, modular, and repetitive elements. Besides all advantages of brutalism, this style is sharply criticized for being cold, crude, cruel, and not appropriate for many climates. Brutalism also became popular with governmental and institutional buildings in modern architecture period and most of the well-known university campuses were built in this style. The purpose of this paper is to study the adaptability of brutalist style with institutional buildings and evaluate it from this point of view. Three institutional buildings have been selected as case studies for evaluating in this research such as The Royal College of Physicians, Brunel University Lecture Theatre, and Metu faculty of architecture. Due to this study, Brutalist style through their fire-resistant and durable materials which don't need to be renovated constantly is suitable for institutional buildings. © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEDP Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofE3S Web of Conferencesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectReinforced concreteen_US
dc.subjectBuilding designen_US
dc.subjectCase-studiesen_US
dc.subjectDurable materialsen_US
dc.subjectFire resistanten_US
dc.subjectInstitutional buildingen_US
dc.subjectModern architecturesen_US
dc.subjectUniversity campusen_US
dc.subjectArchitectural designen_US
dc.titleBrutalism: As a preferred style for institutional buildings in modern architecture perioden_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Architecture and Design, Department of Architectureen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Güzel Sanatlar Tasarım ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, Mimarlık Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume231en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85100407614en_US
dc.institutionauthorImani, Elena-
dc.identifier.doi10.1051/e3sconf/202123104001-
dc.authorscopusid57221851139-
dc.authorscopusid57221849981-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality--
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeConference Object-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Mimarlık Bölümü / Department of Architecture
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

82
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.