Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/1524
Title: Biomechanical Fixation Strength Comparison Of Ilioingunial And Medial Stoppa Approaches On Anterior Column Fractures
Authors: Kaçıra, Burkay Kutluhan
Özkaya, Mustafa
Kıran, Uygar
Türkmen, Faik
Arazi, Mehmet
Demir, Teyfik
144123
Keywords: Anterior column fractures
medial stoppa approach
ilioinguinal approach
pelvis
Issue Date: Sep-2016
Publisher: World Scientific Publ Co Pte Ltd
Source: Kacira, B. K., Özkaya, M., Kiran, U., Türkmen, F., Arazi, M., & Demir, T. (2016). Biomechanical fixation strength comparison of ilioingunial and medial stoppa approaches on anterior column fractures. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 16(06), 1650081.
Abstract: Background: Both the ilioinguinal and Stoppa approaches have been used as standard methods for treating anterior column fractures of the pelvis. Objective: We aimed to compare the rigidity of pelvises that were treated using these two approaches. Methods: Fifteen synthetic pelvises were used as test models. Of these, 5 pelvises did not undergo any treatment (control group), and 10 pelvises underwent treatment of one column using the ilioinguinal approach and the other using the medial Stoppa approach (treated group). The compression test was performed on all pelvises, and rigidity of the pelvises was compared between the control and treated groups. Results: A statistical difference was found in the angle between the center of the femoral head and the line from the pubic symphysis to load application between the control and treated groups, using the ilioinguinal approach. The parametric displacement was greater in the treated group using the ilioinguinal approach than in the control group. There were no significant differences between the control and treated groups using the Stoppa approach, and the ilioinguinal approaches. Conclusion: Clinically, the Stoppa approach has several advantages over the ilioinguinal approach. However, based on the compression test, there was no difference in biomechanical rigidity between the fixations performed using these two approaches.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519416500810
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/1524
ISSN: 0219-5194
Appears in Collections:Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Mechanical Engineering
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection

Show full item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Sep 23, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on Sep 24, 2022

Page view(s)

38
checked on Feb 6, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.