Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/1879
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÇelebioğlu, E. C.-
dc.contributor.authorAldur, M. M.-
dc.contributor.authorTunalı, Selçuk-
dc.contributor.authorHayran, M.-
dc.contributor.authorTaşçıoğlu, Ayşe Beliz-
dc.contributor.authorSargon, F. M.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T14:39:33Z
dc.date.available2019-07-10T14:39:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-11
dc.identifier.citationÇelebioğlu, E. C., Aldur, M. M., Tunali, S., Hayran, M., Taoğlu, A. B., & Sargon, F. M. (2017). A comparison of basilar artery diameters measured by T2WI and TOF MR angiography. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 39(11), 1243-1247. doi:10.1007/s00276-017-1871-6en_US
dc.identifier.issn0930-1038
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00276-017-1871-6-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/1879-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of our study is to compare basilar artery diameters (BAD) measured by T2WI to diameters measured by TOF MR angiography (MRA). By doing this, we hope to understand how compatible these two methodologies are with each other. We used data from 100 patients (59 females, 41 males) who underwent a session of both T2W MRI and TOF MRA at the same time (ages between 18 and 83). We measured BAD by both T2WI and TOF MRA in three different levels. We then compared these diameters measured by two different methodologies to each other. In an area between the vertebrobasilar junction and posterior cerebral artery, all data measured by T2WI and TOF MRA in three different levels were analyzed. Average diameters measured by T2WI and TOF MRA turned out to be 79.5% correlated with each other. As a result of our mathematical model that we came up with through regression analysis, we calculated that measurements taken by T2WI on mid-pontine levels could predict TOF MRA measures with 78.3% accuracy. In T2WI and TOF MRA, average diameters measured were 2.982 +/- 0.4717 and 3.205 +/- 0.4281 mm, respectively. Statistical analyses showed that images measured by T2W series were significantly smaller than those measured by TOF MRA (p < 0.05). Our study showed that BAD measured by T2WI were smaller than those measured by TOF MRA. We think that it will be beneficial to refer our results to avoid T2WI and TOF MRA mismatch when evaluating BAD.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag Franceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical and Radiologic Anatomyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBasilar artery diameteren_US
dc.subjectBasilar arteryen_US
dc.subjectTOF MRAen_US
dc.subjectMRIen_US
dc.subjectDolichoectatic basilar arteryen_US
dc.subjectArterial ectasiaen_US
dc.titleA comparison of basilar artery diameters measured by T2WI and TOF MR angiography.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, School of Medicine, Department of Basic Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.startpage1243
dc.identifier.endpage1247
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000413253400009en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85019650315en_US
dc.institutionauthorTunalı, Selçuk-
dc.contributor.YOKid182380-
dc.identifier.pmid28516244en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00276-017-1871-6-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.dept03.14. Department of Internal Medicine-
crisitem.author.dept03.14. Department of Internal Medicine-
Appears in Collections:PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü / Department of Basic Medical Sciences
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Sep 23, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Sep 24, 2022

Page view(s)

34
checked on Dec 26, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.