Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3232
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYüksel, Erdem-
dc.contributor.authorÖzülken, Kemal-
dc.contributor.authorUzel, Mehmet Murat-
dc.contributor.authorTaşlıpınar Uzel, Ayşe Güzin-
dc.contributor.authorAydoğan, Semih-
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-30T07:28:05Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-30T07:28:05Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationYuksel, E., Ozulken, K., Uzel, M. M., Taslipinar Uzel, A. G., & Aydoğan, S. (2019). Comparison of samfilcon A and lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses in reducing postoperative pain and accelerating re-epithelialization after photorefractive keratectomy. International Ophthalmology, 39(11), 2569-2574. doi:10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9en_US
dc.identifier.issn0165-5701
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/3232-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the efficacy of Samfilcon A and Lotrafilcon B bandage contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: In this study, patients with bilateral PRK were assigned for the fitting of Lotrafilcon B lens and Samfilcon A lens. The patients were examined on the day of surgery and on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. Slit biomicroscopy was performed to assess epithelial defect size in the postoperative examinations. The subjective evaluation of pain and visual symptoms was recorded on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. Results: Analysis was made of 68 eyes of 34 patients who fulfilled the criteria and had PRK for correction of low to moderate myopia/astigmatism. On postoperative days 1 and 2, pain and epiphora scores were significantly lower in eyes with Samfilcon A lens (p < 0.001 for all), and on postoperative day 3, the differences were not significant (p = 0.414 and p = 0.180, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two lenses in respect of the levels of photophobia. The difference in epithelial defect size was statistically lower in eyes with Samfilcon A lens compared to Lotrafilcon B on day 1 (16.89 mm2 vs. 21.07 mm2; p = 0.003) and day 2 (1.49 mm2 vs. 2.46 mm2; p < 0.001). The difference was not significant on day 3. (0.05 mm2 vs. 0.05 mm2; p = 1.000). Conclusions: The Samfilcon A lens is superior to the Lotrafilcon B lens in reducing postoperative pain and accelerating re-epithelialization. © 2019, Springer Nature B.V.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCataract en_US
dc.subject Ophthalmic Solutions en_US
dc.subject Photorefractive keratectomyen_US
dc.titleComparison of Samfilcon A and Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel bandage contact lenses in reducing postoperative pain and accelerating re-epithelialization after photorefractive keratectomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, School of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciencesen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.issue11
dc.identifier.startpage2569
dc.identifier.endpage2574
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85065498979en_US
dc.institutionauthorÖzülken, Kemal-
dc.identifier.pmid31065904en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10792-019-01105-9-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü / Department of Surgical Sciences
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Apr 20, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Sep 24, 2022

Page view(s)

32
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.