Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/7400
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSağlam, Hakan-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-11T15:56:49Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-11T15:56:49Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citation2nd World Conference on Design, Arts and Education (DAE) -- MAY 09-12, 2013 -- Ion Mincu Univ Architecture & Urbanism, Fac Architectural, Bucharest, ROMANIAen_US
dc.identifier.issn1877-0428-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1314-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/7400-
dc.description.abstractThe concept of ornament has emerged as a result of the existence of the human being and its relation to its environment. Ornament of objects, which aim at adding qualitative features to objects alongside their quantitative states, is a practice that is as old as humanity. Within this process of the individual's efforts in thinking, designing, creating, and communicating, one comes across ornament in every field of design, from little objects to urban planning. Discussions especially on architectural ornament has been popular in every age. Since the time of Vitruvius who set the stage for conceptual discussion of architecture, ornament, due to its social and psychological functions, has almost uninterruptedly been a major topic for discussion. This can be seen as the language's (that is used to perceive and narrate architecture as a spatial art) benefitting from formal-physical elements (which are mostly rather found on a more superficial and easily understood level) of artistic communication. Ornament, whose function-meaning and/or form go through changes according to ages, within the context of architecture, where it belongs to the highest level of artistic communication language, has been at the core of these discussions. The aim of this paper is to re-evaluate architecture-ornament relation within history and to re-discuss it in a rather popular way by drawing attention to the most controversial climaxes in new architectural perspective. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bven_US
dc.relation.ispartof2Nd World Conference On Design, Arts And Education (Dae-2013)en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectarchitectural ornamenten_US
dc.subjectdesignen_US
dc.subjecthistorical perspective of ornamenten_US
dc.titleRe-thinking the Concept of "Ornament" in Architectural Designen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesProcedia Social and Behavioral Sciencesen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Fine Arts Design and Architecture, Department of Architectureen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Güzel Sanatlar Tasarım ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, Mimarlık Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume122en_US
dc.identifier.startpage126en_US
dc.identifier.endpage133en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000335819600022en_US
dc.institutionauthorSağlam, Hakan-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1314-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.relation.conference2nd World Conference on Design, Arts and Education (DAE)en_US
dc.identifier.scopusquality--
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeConference Object-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Mimarlık Bölümü / Department of Architecture
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Mar 9, 2024

Page view(s)

54
checked on Mar 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.