Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/889
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÖnen, Mehmet Reşid-
dc.contributor.authorBaşgül, Cemile-
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, İlhan-
dc.contributor.authorÖzkaya, Mustafa-
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Teyfik-
dc.contributor.authorNaderi, Sait-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-29T13:07:56Z
dc.date.available2019-03-29T13:07:56Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-01
dc.identifier.citationÖnen, M. R., Başgül, C., Yılmaz, İ., Özkaya, M., Demir, T., & Naderi, S. (2018). Comparison of rigid and semi-rigid instrumentation under acute load on vertebrae treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures: An experimental study. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 232(4), 388-394.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0954-4119
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0954411918755416-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11851/889-
dc.description.abstractRigid and semi-rigid fixations are investigated several times in order to compare their biomechanical stability. Interbody fusion techniques are also preferable for maintaining the sagittal balance by protecting the disk height. In this study, the biomechanical comparison of semi-rigid and rigid fixations with posterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures is conducted under trauma. There were four different test groups to analyze the effect of acute load on treated ovine vertebrae. First and second groups were fixed with polyetheretherketone rods and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages, respectively. Third and fourth groups were fixed with titanium rods and posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cages, respectively. The drop tests were conducted with 7 kg weight. There were six samples in each group so the drop test repeated 24 times in total. The test samples were photographed and X-rayed (laterally and anteroposteriorly) before and after drop test. Two fractures were observed on group 1. Conversely, there were no fractures observed for group 2. There were no anterior element fractures for both groups 1 and 2. However, one fracture seen on group 3 was anterior element fracture, whereas the other three were posterior element fractures. All three fractures were anterior element fractures for group 4. Treated vertebrae with polyetheretherketone rods and posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages showed the best durability to the drop tests among the groups. Semi-rigid fixation gave better results than rigid fixation according to failed segments. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages seem to be better option for semi-rigid fixation, however mentioned surgical disadvantages must be considered.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicineen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectrigid fixationen_US
dc.subjectSemi-rigid fixationen_US
dc.subjectcompression loaden_US
dc.subjectfracture energyen_US
dc.subjectdrop mechanismen_US
dc.subjectposterior fusionen_US
dc.subjectload sharingen_US
dc.subjectpolyetheretherketone roden_US
dc.subjecttransforaminal lumbar interbody fusionen_US
dc.subjectposterior lumbar interbody fusionen_US
dc.titleComparison of rigid and semi-rigid instrumentation under acute load on vertebrae treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures: An experimental studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.departmentFaculties, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümütr_TR
dc.identifier.volume232
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage388
dc.identifier.endpage394
dc.authoridDemir, Teyfik [0000-0001-6352-8302]-
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000429916100006en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85045306467en_US
dc.institutionauthorDemir, Teyfik-
dc.identifier.pmid29393010en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0954411918755416-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0954411918755416-
dc.authorscopusidDemir, Teyfik [3488228600]-
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü / Department of Mechanical Engineering
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / PubMed Indexed Publications Collection
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show simple item record



CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Apr 20, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
checked on Apr 20, 2024

Page view(s)

52
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check




Altmetric


Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.