Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||A comparison of basilar artery diameters measured by T2WI and TOF MR angiography.||Authors:||Çelebioğlu, E. C.
Aldur, M. M.
Taşçıoğlu, Ayşe Beliz
Sargon, F. M.
|Keywords:||Basilar artery diameter
Dolichoectatic basilar artery
|Issue Date:||Nov-2017||Publisher:||Springer-Verlag France||Source:||Çelebioğlu, E. C., Aldur, M. M., Tunali, S., Hayran, M., Taoğlu, A. B., & Sargon, F. M. (2017). A comparison of basilar artery diameters measured by T2WI and TOF MR angiography. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 39(11), 1243-1247. doi:10.1007/s00276-017-1871-6||Abstract:||The purpose of our study is to compare basilar artery diameters (BAD) measured by T2WI to diameters measured by TOF MR angiography (MRA). By doing this, we hope to understand how compatible these two methodologies are with each other. We used data from 100 patients (59 females, 41 males) who underwent a session of both T2W MRI and TOF MRA at the same time (ages between 18 and 83). We measured BAD by both T2WI and TOF MRA in three different levels. We then compared these diameters measured by two different methodologies to each other. In an area between the vertebrobasilar junction and posterior cerebral artery, all data measured by T2WI and TOF MRA in three different levels were analyzed. Average diameters measured by T2WI and TOF MRA turned out to be 79.5% correlated with each other. As a result of our mathematical model that we came up with through regression analysis, we calculated that measurements taken by T2WI on mid-pontine levels could predict TOF MRA measures with 78.3% accuracy. In T2WI and TOF MRA, average diameters measured were 2.982 +/- 0.4717 and 3.205 +/- 0.4281 mm, respectively. Statistical analyses showed that images measured by T2W series were significantly smaller than those measured by TOF MRA (p < 0.05). Our study showed that BAD measured by T2WI were smaller than those measured by TOF MRA. We think that it will be beneficial to refer our results to avoid T2WI and TOF MRA mismatch when evaluating BAD.||URI:||https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00276-017-1871-6
|Appears in Collections:||Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / Scopus Indexed Publications Collection|
Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü / Department of Basic Medical Sciences
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu / WoS Indexed Publications Collection
Show full item record
checked on Sep 23, 2022
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on Sep 24, 2022
checked on Nov 28, 2022
Items in GCRIS Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.